Brief Report: Understanding Retraction Trends in Research Landscape
Disclosure: In this brief report, the authors were assisted by OpenAI to analyse the dataset/metadata and used for data visualisation. The phenomenon of scientific retractions, defined as the formal removal of a published paper from the scientific record due to errors, fraud, or ethical violations, has garnered increasing attention as a critical indicator of research integrity and the effectiveness of peer-review and publication frameworks. This … Continue reading Brief Report: Understanding Retraction Trends in Research Landscape
Konsensus Ilmiah Lahir dari Sebuah Konstruksi Sosial
Resensi Buku Klasik Bruno Latour dan Steve Wollgar “Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts”. Dalam karya mereka, Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (1979), Bruno Latour dan Steve Woolgar menantang pandangan tradisional tentang objektivitas ilmiah dengan mengemukakan bahwa konsensus ilmiah bukan sekadar hasil penemuan kebenaran universal. Sebaliknya, mereka berpendapat bahwa konsensus adalah fenomena yang dikonstruksi secara sosial, dibentuk melalui negosiasi, perdebatan, dan praktik … Continue reading Konsensus Ilmiah Lahir dari Sebuah Konstruksi Sosial
Covering scientific consensus: What to avoid and how to get it right
by Denise-Marie Ordway, The Journalist’s Resource November 23, 2021 When reporting on controversial policy topics such as vaccine safety and climate change, journalists can look to scientific consensus to bolster their coverage and battle misinformation. If you’re unsure what scientific consensus is, don’t understand its significance or have no idea how to gauge it, keep reading. This tip sheet features practical advice from three researchers … Continue reading Covering scientific consensus: What to avoid and how to get it right
How Post-Publication Review is Changing Research Accountability
In the digital age, science is under the microscope like never before. An article recently published in the Annals of Library and Information Studies reveals how post-publication review—the process of scrutinizing research after it’s published—is revolutionizing scientific accountability. By combining traditional methods with the reach of social media and digital platforms, researchers and the public alike are uncovering flaws, challenging findings, and ensuring the reliability … Continue reading How Post-Publication Review is Changing Research Accountability
